District Administration — Missouri K-12 Education Reference
Table of Contents
- MSIP 6 Accreditation
- School Funding Formula
- School Board Governance
- Superintendent Role & Responsibilities
- ESSA Compliance
- Title Programs (I, II, III, IV)
- Charter Schools
- Data Reporting (MOSIS / Core Data)
- District Improvement Planning (DSIP)
- Human Capital Management
- Legal Compliance Framework
- Fiscal Management
1. MSIP 6 Accreditation
Overview
The Missouri School Improvement Program (MSIP 6) is DESE's accreditation and accountability system for all public school districts. MSIP 6 replaced MSIP 5 and is aligned to ESSA requirements.
Five MSIP 6 Standards
| Standard | Focus |
|---|---|
| 1. Academic Achievement | Student proficiency on MAP/EOC assessments; ACT/SAT college readiness |
| 2. Subgroup Achievement | Performance of historically underperforming subgroups (race, income, disability, ELL) |
| 3. High School Readiness (K-8) / College & Career Readiness (9-12) | K-8: attendance, course completion, behavior; 9-12: graduation rate, postsecondary enrollment, credentials |
| 4. Attendance | Student attendance rates; chronic absenteeism |
| 5. School Quality / Climate | School climate surveys, teacher retention, advanced coursework access, arts/CTE participation |
Annual Performance Report (APR)
- DESE publishes an APR for every district and school annually
- APR includes performance on each MSIP 6 standard/indicator
- APR data drives accreditation status determination
Accreditation Classifications
| Status | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Accredited | District meets or exceeds performance expectations |
| Provisionally Accredited | District has identified deficiencies; improvement plan required |
| Unaccredited | Serious performance failures; significant state intervention possible |
Consequences of Non-Accreditation
- State-appointed advisory team or special administrative board
- Mandatory improvement plan with DESE oversight
- Student transfer provisions (RSMo 167.131 — students in unaccredited districts may transfer to accredited districts at the sending district's expense)
- Potential lapse of the district's corporate organization (RSMo 162.081)
- Loss of local governance (state-appointed board)
MSIP 6 Review Cycle
- Districts undergo comprehensive review approximately every 5 years
- Annual data monitoring between full reviews
- Continuous improvement expectation with annual goal-setting
2. School Funding Formula
State Foundation Formula (SB 287, as amended)
Core concept: Missouri's formula calculates a State Adequacy Target (SAT) per weighted average daily attendance (WADA), then determines each district's share based on local wealth.
Key Components
| Component | Description |
|---|---|
| Average Daily Attendance (ADA) | Primary enrollment measure; based on student attendance counts |
| Weighted ADA (WADA) | ADA adjusted by weighting factors for special populations |
| State Adequacy Target (SAT) | Dollar amount per WADA that represents "adequate" funding |
| Local Effort | Local tax revenue (primarily property tax); deducted from state entitlement |
| State Aid | SAT × WADA minus Local Effort = State Aid (simplified) |
| Hold Harmless | Districts cannot receive less state aid than they received in the base year (prevents sudden funding drops) |
Weighting Factors
Students in certain categories receive additional weight:
- Free/Reduced Price Lunch eligible students
- Students with IEPs
- English Language Learners
- Students in transportation-eligible areas
Local Revenue Sources
- Property tax (operating levy): primary local funding source; Proposition C (1982) dedicated a portion of sales tax to education
- Operating levy cap: $6.00 per $100 assessed valuation (with voter override possible)
- Bond issues: for capital improvements, technology, transportation; require 4/7 (57%) voter approval
- Proposition C sales tax: state sales tax distributed to districts based on ADA
Federal Funding
Federal funds supplement (not supplant) state and local funding:
- Title I, II, III, IV (ESSA)
- IDEA Part B
- Perkins V (CTE)
- School meals programs (NSLP, SBP)
- E-Rate
- Impact Aid (districts with federal property)
3. School Board Governance
Authority (RSMo Chapter 162)
Missouri school boards are the governing bodies of public school districts:
- 7 members (most districts); elected at-large or by ward
- Terms: 3 years (staggered elections in April)
- Board sets policy; superintendent implements policy
- Board hires and evaluates the superintendent
- Board adopts the annual budget
- Board approves expenditures above thresholds set by policy
- Board has authority over employment, contracts, and property
Open Meetings (Sunshine Law — RSMo Chapter 610)
- All board meetings must be open to the public (with limited exceptions for closed sessions)
- Closed session permitted for: personnel matters, litigation, real estate negotiations, individualized student discipline, security matters, and other RSMo 610.021 exceptions
- Meeting notices must be posted at least 24 hours in advance
- Minutes of open sessions are public records
- Votes taken in closed session must be recorded and made public
Board Member Requirements
- Resident of the district
- Registered voter
- At least 24 years old (for most districts)
- No felony conviction
- Not employed by the district (conflict of interest)
Board Ethics
- Conflict of interest disclosure (RSMo 162.215)
- Prohibition on nepotism (varies by district policy; some statutory provisions)
- Financial disclosure requirements for school officials
- MSBA (Missouri School Boards Association) Code of Ethics (voluntary but widely adopted)
4. Superintendent Role & Responsibilities
Certification
- Must hold a valid Missouri Superintendent Certificate
- Requirements: master's degree (doctorate preferred), superintendent preparation program, administrative experience, passing assessment, background check
Core Responsibilities
- Chief executive officer of the district
- Implements board policy
- Recommends hiring, discipline, and termination of employees to the board
- Develops and recommends the annual budget
- Serves as primary liaison between board and staff
- Leads strategic planning and improvement efforts
- Represents the district publicly
- Ensures compliance with all state and federal requirements
- Reports to DESE as required (MOSIS, Core Data, APR, compliance reports)
5. ESSA Compliance
Every Student Succeeds Act (2015) — Key District Requirements
| Area | Requirement |
|---|---|
| State plan alignment | District programs must align to Missouri's ESSA State Plan |
| Accountability | Participate in MSIP 6; address schools identified for CSI/TSI |
| Assessments | Administer MAP, EOC, ACCESS for ELLs per state testing calendar |
| Report cards | Publish school and district report cards (online) with required data elements |
| Teacher quality | Ensure teachers meet state certification requirements; report teacher qualifications to parents |
| Title program compliance | Maintain and submit required plans, budgets, and reports for all Title programs |
| Parent engagement | Meet parent notification and engagement requirements |
| Data reporting | Submit required data through MOSIS and other DESE reporting systems |
School Identification Under ESSA
| Category | Criteria | Response |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) | Bottom 5% of schools; high schools with <67% graduation rate; TSI school not improving | Comprehensive needs assessment, evidence-based improvement plan, resource allocation, monitoring |
| Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI) | One or more subgroups consistently underperforming | Targeted improvement plan, root cause analysis, progress monitoring |
| Additional Targeted Support (ATSI) | TSI school with subgroup(s) performing at CSI level | More intensive intervention, potential reclassification as CSI if not improving |
6. Title Programs (I, II, III, IV)
Title I, Part A — Improving Basic Programs
- Purpose: Academic achievement for disadvantaged students
- Allocation: Formula-based on poverty counts (Census data)
- Uses: Supplemental instruction, interventions, materials, PD, parent engagement
- Models: Schoolwide (40%+ poverty) or Targeted Assistance
- Key rules: Supplement-not-supplant, comparability, set-aside for parent engagement (1% if >$500K), set-aside for homeless students (McKinney-Vento)
Title II, Part A — Supporting Effective Instruction
- Purpose: Teacher and principal quality
- Uses: Recruitment, retention, PD, class-size reduction, teacher leadership, induction/mentoring
- Key rule: Must be evidence-based; aligned to comprehensive needs assessment
Title III, Part A — English Language Acquisition
- Purpose: Supplement ELL services
- Uses: Supplemental ELL instruction, PD for ELL teachers, parent outreach (in home languages)
- Key rules: Supplement-not-supplant; must have base ELL program funded with state/local funds
Title IV, Part A — Student Support and Academic Enrichment
- Purpose: Well-rounded education, safe/healthy students, effective use of technology
- Three pillars:
- Well-rounded education (STEM, arts, civics, social studies, advanced coursework)
- Safe and healthy students (mental health, drug/violence prevention, school climate)
- Effective use of technology (devices, infrastructure, digital literacy, PD)
- Key rule: Districts receiving >$30,000 must conduct a needs assessment and spend minimum amounts across all three pillars
7. Charter Schools
Missouri Charter School Law (RSMo 160.400-160.425)
Where Permitted
Charter schools in Missouri are currently limited to:
- City of St. Louis
- Kansas City (KCMO)
- Unaccredited districts (or districts that have been unaccredited within the previous 3 years)
Sponsors
Eligible charter school sponsors:
- Local school board
- Missouri university/college with approved education programs
- Community college (in some circumstances)
Accountability
- Charter schools must meet the same assessment requirements as traditional public schools
- Subject to MSIP 6 accountability
- Charter contracts define performance expectations; renewal depends on meeting those expectations
- Sponsors are responsible for oversight and can revoke or non-renew charters for failure to meet academic, financial, or operational standards
Funding
- Charter schools receive per-pupil funding from the resident district (based on the district's average per-pupil expenditure)
- Charter schools may also receive federal Title funding
- Charter schools do not have local taxing authority
8. Data Reporting (MOSIS / Core Data)
MOSIS (Missouri Student Information System)
- What: Individual student-level data reporting system
- Data elements: demographics, enrollment, attendance, discipline, assessment, special education, ELL, mobility, programs
- Reporting cycles: Fall (October), Spring (additional), End-of-Year
- Used for: Accountability (MSIP 6, APR), state/federal reporting, funding calculations, research
Core Data
- What: District and school-level reporting to DESE
- Data elements: staffing, salaries, revenue/expenditures, facilities, transportation, programs
- Cycles: Annual (primarily fall submission with updates)
Compliance Obligations
- Timely and accurate data submission is a district obligation
- Errors in MOSIS/Core Data can affect funding calculations, APR scores, and accreditation
- DESE provides data quality tools and validation checks
- Districts must designate a Core Data coordinator
9. District Improvement Planning (DSIP)
District Strategic Plan / DSIP
The DSIP aggregates building-level CSIPs into a coherent district-wide strategy:
Required Components
- District mission, vision, and goals
- Needs assessment based on disaggregated data
- Improvement goals aligned to MSIP 6 standards
- Strategies and action steps with evidence base
- Professional development plan (district-wide)
- Resource allocation aligned to priorities
- Monitoring and evaluation plan
- Stakeholder engagement process
Alignment
- DSIP should align to: MSIP 6 standards, ESSA requirements, Title program plans, special education improvement plan, ELL plan, and any DESE-required improvement plans
- Building CSIPs should ladder up to the DSIP
10. Human Capital Management
Recruitment & Retention Challenges
Missouri faces educator shortages in:
- Special education
- Mathematics and science (secondary)
- ELL/ESL
- Career and technical education
- Rural districts (across all subjects)
- School counseling and psychology
Retention Strategies
- Competitive compensation (salary schedules, benefits, signing bonuses)
- Mentoring and induction programs
- Leadership pathways (teacher leaders, department chairs, instructional coaches)
- Professional development opportunities
- Positive school culture and supportive administration
- Housing incentives (some rural districts)
- Loan forgiveness program awareness (federal PSLF, state-specific programs)
Substitute Shortage
A persistent challenge across Missouri. Strategies include:
- Increasing substitute pay
- Streamlining substitute certification process
- Building relationships with substitute pools
- Using long-term substitutes strategically
- Internal coverage systems (admin coverage, study hall consolidation)
11. Legal Compliance Framework
Key Federal Laws
| Law | Coverage |
|---|---|
| ESSA | Accountability, assessments, Title programs, teacher quality |
| IDEA | Special education, FAPE, LRE, procedural safeguards -- see Specialists |
| Section 504 | Disability accommodation in programs receiving federal funds -- see 504 Plans & Forms |
| ADA | Accessibility of facilities and programs |
| Title IX | Prohibition of sex discrimination in education |
| FERPA | Student records privacy -- see Missouri Education Law |
| Title VI (Civil Rights Act) | Prohibition of race/national origin discrimination |
| Title VII (Civil Rights Act) | Employment discrimination prohibition |
| McKinney-Vento | Homeless student protections |
| PPRA | Protection of Pupil Rights (surveys, data collection) |
Key Missouri Laws
| Statute | Coverage |
|---|---|
| RSMo 160-178 | Education code (comprehensive) |
| RSMo 162 | School district organization, board governance |
| RSMo 163 | School finance, state aid |
| RSMo 167 | Student enrollment, attendance, transfers, discipline |
| RSMo 168 | Teacher/administrator employment, tenure, certification |
| RSMo 170 | Curriculum requirements (personal finance, CPR, health education) |
| RSMo 210.115 | Mandated reporting of child abuse/neglect |
| RSMo 610 | Sunshine Law (open meetings, open records) |
12. Fiscal Management
Budget Process
- Superintendent/CFO develops preliminary budget based on enrollment projections, revenue estimates, and strategic priorities
- Board reviews and provides direction
- Public hearing on proposed budget (required)
- Board adoption of annual budget (prior to start of fiscal year, July 1)
- Budget amendments as needed throughout the year (board approval required)
Fund Accounting
Missouri school districts use fund accounting:
- Incidental Fund (Fund 1): day-to-day operations not classified elsewhere
- Teachers Fund (Fund 2): certified staff salaries and benefits
- Capital Projects Fund (Fund 3): facilities, equipment, technology capital
- Debt Service Fund (Fund 4): bond principal and interest payments
- Special Revenue Fund (Fund 5+): specific restricted purposes (food service, etc.)
Annual Audit
- Independent financial audit required annually (RSMo 165.121)
- Audit report submitted to DESE and State Auditor's office
- Single Audit required if federal expenditures exceed $750,000 (2 CFR Part 200)
Financial Transparency
- Annual Secretary of the Board Report (ASBR) published and submitted to DESE
- Budget documents available for public inspection
- Expenditure data increasingly available online (DESE Financial Data portal)
Related Resources
- MSIP 6 & Accreditation Details -- governance structures and accreditation deep dive
- Missouri Education Law -- FERPA, IDEA, Section 504, and other legal frameworks
- Compliance Calendar -- monthly reporting deadlines and MOSIS due dates
- Funding & Programs -- Title I-IV, IDEA Part B, Perkins V funding details
- Discipline & Behavior -- PBIS, restorative practices, and discipline policy requirements
Nonpartisan informational resource for Missouri — District 2 — not legal, medical, or financial advice. Source: dougdevitre/access-to-education.
Paid for by Matt Grant for Congress.
