Skip to content
Matt Grant for Congress — Missouri — District 2
Access to Education

Community resource

Funding & Programs — Missouri K-12 Education Reference

Funding & Programs — Missouri K-12 Education Reference

Table of Contents

  1. State Funding Formula (Overview)
  2. Title I — Improving Basic Programs
  3. Title II — Supporting Effective Instruction
  4. Title III — English Language Acquisition
  5. Title IV — Student Support and Academic Enrichment
  6. IDEA Part B — Special Education Funding
  7. Perkins V — Career and Technical Education
  8. A+ Schools Program Funding
  9. School Meal Programs
  10. E-Rate and Technology Funding
  11. Transportation Funding
  12. Bond Issues and Capital Funding
  13. Grants and Supplemental Funding Sources
graph TD FED["<b>Federal Government</b>"] STATE["<b>State of Missouri</b>"] LOCAL["<b>Local Sources</b>"] DESE["DESE"] DIST["<b>School District</b>"] SCHOOL["<b>Schools / Students</b>"] FED -->|"Title I, II, III, IV"| DESE FED -->|"IDEA Part B"| DESE FED -->|"Perkins V (CTE)"| DESE FED -->|"USDA Meal Programs"| DESE FED -->|"E-Rate"| DIST STATE -->|"Foundation Formula<br/>(SAT x WADA - Local Effort)"| DIST STATE -->|"A+ Tuition Reimbursement"| SCHOOL STATE -->|"Transportation Aid"| DIST DESE -->|"Formula allocation"| DIST LOCAL -->|"Property Tax"| DIST LOCAL -->|"Prop C Sales Tax"| DIST LOCAL -->|"Bond Issues"| DIST LOCAL -->|"Grants & Donations"| DIST DIST -->|"Programs & Services"| SCHOOL style FED fill:#2c5f8a,color:#fff style STATE fill:#4a8c3f,color:#fff style LOCAL fill:#b8860b,color:#fff style DESE fill:#5f7d9c,color:#fff style DIST fill:#6b4c8a,color:#fff style SCHOOL fill:#c0392b,color:#fff

1. State Funding Formula (Overview)

Foundation Formula (SB 287)

Missouri's education funding formula calculates state aid based on the difference between what a district needs to spend (based on SAT × WADA) and what it can raise locally.

Simplified calculation:

State Aid = (SAT × WADA) − Local Effort

Key Terms

TermDefinition
SAT (State Adequacy Target)Per-pupil funding target set by the legislature; represents the cost of an adequate education
ADA (Average Daily Attendance)Average number of students attending school daily
WADA (Weighted ADA)ADA adjusted by weighting factors for special populations
Local EffortRevenue generated from local property taxes and Proposition C sales tax

Weighting Factors

Additional weights increase WADA for districts serving:

  • Free/Reduced Lunch eligible students — additional weight reflects the higher cost of serving economically disadvantaged students
  • Students with IEPs — reflects cost of special education services
  • English Language Learners — reflects cost of ELL services
  • Transportation-eligible students — reflects transportation costs

Hold Harmless

Districts cannot receive less state aid than they received in a designated base year. This prevents sudden funding drops when formula changes would otherwise reduce a district's allocation.

Adequacy vs. Equity

The formula attempts to balance:

  • Adequacy: ensuring every district has enough funding for an adequate education
  • Equity: providing more state aid to districts with less local wealth

2. Title I — Improving Basic Programs

Purpose

Provide supplemental academic support to students in high-poverty schools to help all students meet state academic standards.

Allocation Method

  • Formula-based: Census poverty data (number of children ages 5-17 in poverty)
  • Flows: Federal → DESE → Districts → Schools
  • Districts allocate to schools based on poverty rank-ordering

Allowable Uses

  • Supplemental instruction and tutoring (before/after school, summer, extended day)
  • Instructional materials and technology
  • Professional development for Title I staff
  • Parent and family engagement activities
  • Preschool programs (Title I may fund pre-K)
  • Salaries for Title I-funded positions (interventionists, instructional coaches, paraprofessionals)

Key Compliance Rules

RuleDescription
Supplement, not supplantTitle I funds must supplement (add to), not replace, state and local funds
ComparabilityDistrict must demonstrate that state/local funding across schools is comparable before adding Title I
Set-asides1% of allocation for parent engagement (if district >$500K); reasonable set-aside for homeless students
Schoolwide vs. Targeted40%+ poverty → may operate schoolwide; <40% → targeted assistance to identified students
Evidence-based interventionsStrategies must meet ESSA evidence standards (Tier 1-4)

CSI and TSI Schools

Title I schools identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) or Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI) must use a portion of Title I funds for improvement activities.


3. Title II — Supporting Effective Instruction

Purpose

Improve teacher and principal quality through professional development, recruitment, retention, and leadership development.

Allowable Uses

  • Professional development (must be evidence-based, sustained, and job-embedded)
  • Class-size reduction
  • Teacher recruitment and retention strategies
  • Mentoring and induction programs for new teachers
  • Teacher leadership development
  • Principal leadership development
  • STEM professional development
  • Literacy coaching
  • Advanced certification support (e.g., National Board Certification)

Key Requirements

  • Must be based on a comprehensive needs assessment
  • Must align to district/school improvement goals
  • PD must be sustained, intensive, and classroom-focused (not one-off workshops)

4. Title III — English Language Acquisition

Purpose

Supplement state and local ELL services to improve English language proficiency and academic achievement of English Learners.

Allocation

  • Formula-based: number of English Learners in the district
  • Small districts may participate through consortia

Allowable Uses

  • Supplemental ELL instruction (beyond what's provided with state/local funds)
  • PD for teachers of ELLs (SIOP, co-teaching, language acquisition strategies)
  • Parent outreach and engagement (in languages families understand)
  • Translation and interpretation services (supplemental)
  • Supplemental materials and technology for ELL instruction

Key Rules

  • Supplement, not supplant — district must first provide a base ELL program with state/local funds
  • Must serve identified English Learners (not general population)
  • Must report ELL performance on ACCESS for ELLs annually
  • Recently exited ELLs (within 2 years) may be counted for funding but must be monitored

5. Title IV — Student Support and Academic Enrichment

Purpose

Provide students with access to a well-rounded education, improve school conditions for student learning, and improve the use of technology.

Three Pillars

PillarFocus AreasMinimum Spend (>$30K)
Well-Rounded EducationSTEM, arts, civics, social studies, AP/IB, college/career readiness, music, foreign languageAt least 20%
Safe & Healthy StudentsMental health services, drug/violence prevention, school-based counseling, bullying prevention, physical education, nutritionAt least 20%
Effective Use of TechnologyDevices, infrastructure, digital literacy, PD for technology integration, blended learningRemaining (no minimum for technology for devices if under 15% of allocation)

Key Rules

  • Districts receiving >$30,000 must conduct a needs assessment and address all three pillars
  • Districts receiving <$30,000 may focus on one or more pillars
  • No more than 15% of allocation may be used to purchase technology infrastructure (devices, equipment)

6. IDEA Part B — Special Education Funding

Purpose

Federal funding to states to support the provision of FAPE for students with disabilities ages 3-21.

Flow of Funds

Federal → DESE → Districts (formula based on child count + poverty data)

Key Requirements

  • Maintenance of Effort (MOE): districts must maintain at least the same level of state/local spending on special education from year to year
  • Excess Cost: IDEA funds may only be used for costs that exceed what the district spends on the average regular education student
  • Supplement, not supplant (with some allowable flexibility for CEIS)
  • Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS): up to 15% of IDEA funds may be used for general education students who need additional support but have not been identified for special education (preventive)

Allowable Uses

  • Special education teacher salaries (supplemental)
  • Related services providers
  • Assistive technology
  • Professional development for special education staff
  • Evaluation and assessment materials
  • Transition services

7. Perkins V — Career and Technical Education

Purpose

Federal funding to develop and strengthen CTE programs and improve student achievement in career and technical areas.

Key Elements

  • Comprehensive Local Needs Assessment (CLNA): required every 2 years
  • Program of Study: sequence of CTE courses leading to a recognized postsecondary credential
  • Size, Scope, and Quality: programs must be sufficient to develop student competency
  • Work-Based Learning: encouraged (internships, apprenticeships, cooperative education)
  • Special Populations: equitable access for students who are members of special populations (disability, ELL, economically disadvantaged, single parents, out-of-workforce, homeless, foster, military)

Allowable Uses

  • CTE curriculum development and equipment
  • PD for CTE teachers
  • Career guidance and counseling
  • Supplemental support for special populations in CTE
  • Articulation agreements with postsecondary institutions

8. A+ Schools Program Funding

State Funding

  • A+ tuition reimbursement is funded through the Missouri Department of Higher Education & Workforce Development (MDHEWD)
  • Reimbursement is "last dollar" — applied after all other non-loan aid
  • Funding is subject to annual state appropriation
  • Historical trend: A+ has been fully funded in most recent years, but appropriation is not guaranteed

School Designation

  • Schools apply to DESE for A+ designation
  • Must meet criteria including: written agreement with DESE, designated A+ coordinator, established tutoring program, documentation system for student eligibility tracking

9. School Meal Programs

National School Lunch Program (NSLP) / School Breakfast Program (SBP)

  • Administered by USDA through DESE School Food Services
  • Reimbursement rates for meals served at free, reduced, and paid levels
  • Districts must follow USDA meal patterns (whole grains, fruits/vegetables, protein, milk, sodium/fat limits)

Free and Reduced Price Meal (FRPM) Eligibility

CategoryIncome Threshold (approximate, updated annually)
Free≤130% Federal Poverty Level
Reduced131-185% Federal Poverty Level
Paid>185% Federal Poverty Level

Community Eligibility Provision (CEP)

  • Schools with ≥40% identified students (directly certified for free meals) may provide free meals to ALL students without individual applications
  • Simplifies administration and reduces stigma
  • Reimbursement calculated based on the Identified Student Percentage (ISP) × 1.6

Other Nutrition Programs

  • Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP): supplemental produce for selected elementary schools
  • Summer Food Service Program (SFSP): free meals at community sites during summer months
  • Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP): meals in before/after school programs, childcare

10. E-Rate and Technology Funding

E-Rate Program

  • Federal program (Universal Service Fund) subsidizing internet and telecommunications for schools
  • Category 1: Internet access and data transport (eligible for 20-90% discount)
  • Category 2: Internal networking (switches, Wi-Fi access points, cabling, UPS)
  • Discount rate based on percentage of FRPM-eligible students and urban/rural status

Application Process

  1. Technology planning (integrated into district strategic plan)
  2. File FCC Form 470 (request for services — competitive bidding)
  3. Competitive bidding period (28 days minimum)
  4. Select service provider
  5. File FCC Form 471 (application for discount)
  6. USAC review and funding decision
  7. Receive services and file for reimbursement/discount

CIPA Compliance

Districts receiving E-Rate must comply with the Children's Internet Protection Act:

  • Internet filtering (block visual content that is obscene, child pornography, or harmful to minors)
  • Internet safety policy adopted by the board
  • At least one public hearing on the policy
  • Technology protection measure (filter) in place

11. Transportation Funding

State Transportation Aid

  • Missouri reimburses districts for a portion of student transportation costs
  • Reimbursement formula considers: route miles, pupil miles, cost per mile, bus fleet, and district size
  • Reimbursement typically covers a fraction of actual transportation costs (historically 30-50%)

Eligibility

  • Students living more than 3.5 miles from school are generally eligible for state-reimbursed transportation (RSMo 167.231)
  • Districts may (and many do) transport students living closer than 3.5 miles, but state reimbursement may be limited
  • IEP-mandated transportation is a related service obligation regardless of distance

12. Bond Issues and Capital Funding

General Obligation Bonds

  • Used for capital projects: building construction/renovation, technology infrastructure, buses, equipment
  • Require 4/7 voter approval (57.14%) at a regular or special election
  • Bonded indebtedness limits: generally 15% of assessed valuation (RSMo 164.011)
  • Repaid through debt service property tax levy

Lease Purchase Agreements

  • Alternative financing for equipment, technology, buses
  • Board approval required; does not require voter approval
  • Limited by annual payment capacity and board policy

13. Grants and Supplemental Funding Sources

DESE Competitive Grants (Examples — availability varies by year)

  • Missouri Preschool Program (MPP) grants
  • Trauma-Informed Schools grants
  • School Safety grants
  • Literacy grants (K-3 reading)
  • STEM grants
  • After-school program grants (21st CCLC)

Federal Competitive Grants

  • 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC) — after-school programs
  • Magnet Schools Assistance Program
  • Charter Schools Program
  • Education Innovation and Research (EIR) grants
  • Full-Service Community Schools grants

Other Funding Sources

  • Missouri Foundation for Education and local education foundations
  • Corporate and community partnerships
  • Parent-Teacher Organizations (PTO/PTA) fundraising
  • Alumni and donor giving (more common in larger districts)
  • Medicaid reimbursement for school-based health services (districts can bill Medicaid for IEP-related health services provided to Medicaid-eligible students)

Nonpartisan informational resource for Missouri — District 2 — not legal, medical, or financial advice. Source: dougdevitre/access-to-education.

Paid for by Matt Grant for Congress.