Funding & Programs — Missouri K-12 Education Reference
Table of Contents
- State Funding Formula (Overview)
- Title I — Improving Basic Programs
- Title II — Supporting Effective Instruction
- Title III — English Language Acquisition
- Title IV — Student Support and Academic Enrichment
- IDEA Part B — Special Education Funding
- Perkins V — Career and Technical Education
- A+ Schools Program Funding
- School Meal Programs
- E-Rate and Technology Funding
- Transportation Funding
- Bond Issues and Capital Funding
- Grants and Supplemental Funding Sources
1. State Funding Formula (Overview)
Foundation Formula (SB 287)
Missouri's education funding formula calculates state aid based on the difference between what a district needs to spend (based on SAT × WADA) and what it can raise locally.
Simplified calculation:
State Aid = (SAT × WADA) − Local Effort
Key Terms
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| SAT (State Adequacy Target) | Per-pupil funding target set by the legislature; represents the cost of an adequate education |
| ADA (Average Daily Attendance) | Average number of students attending school daily |
| WADA (Weighted ADA) | ADA adjusted by weighting factors for special populations |
| Local Effort | Revenue generated from local property taxes and Proposition C sales tax |
Weighting Factors
Additional weights increase WADA for districts serving:
- Free/Reduced Lunch eligible students — additional weight reflects the higher cost of serving economically disadvantaged students
- Students with IEPs — reflects cost of special education services
- English Language Learners — reflects cost of ELL services
- Transportation-eligible students — reflects transportation costs
Hold Harmless
Districts cannot receive less state aid than they received in a designated base year. This prevents sudden funding drops when formula changes would otherwise reduce a district's allocation.
Adequacy vs. Equity
The formula attempts to balance:
- Adequacy: ensuring every district has enough funding for an adequate education
- Equity: providing more state aid to districts with less local wealth
2. Title I — Improving Basic Programs
Purpose
Provide supplemental academic support to students in high-poverty schools to help all students meet state academic standards.
Allocation Method
- Formula-based: Census poverty data (number of children ages 5-17 in poverty)
- Flows: Federal → DESE → Districts → Schools
- Districts allocate to schools based on poverty rank-ordering
Allowable Uses
- Supplemental instruction and tutoring (before/after school, summer, extended day)
- Instructional materials and technology
- Professional development for Title I staff
- Parent and family engagement activities
- Preschool programs (Title I may fund pre-K)
- Salaries for Title I-funded positions (interventionists, instructional coaches, paraprofessionals)
Key Compliance Rules
| Rule | Description |
|---|---|
| Supplement, not supplant | Title I funds must supplement (add to), not replace, state and local funds |
| Comparability | District must demonstrate that state/local funding across schools is comparable before adding Title I |
| Set-asides | 1% of allocation for parent engagement (if district >$500K); reasonable set-aside for homeless students |
| Schoolwide vs. Targeted | 40%+ poverty → may operate schoolwide; <40% → targeted assistance to identified students |
| Evidence-based interventions | Strategies must meet ESSA evidence standards (Tier 1-4) |
CSI and TSI Schools
Title I schools identified for Comprehensive Support and Improvement (CSI) or Targeted Support and Improvement (TSI) must use a portion of Title I funds for improvement activities.
3. Title II — Supporting Effective Instruction
Purpose
Improve teacher and principal quality through professional development, recruitment, retention, and leadership development.
Allowable Uses
- Professional development (must be evidence-based, sustained, and job-embedded)
- Class-size reduction
- Teacher recruitment and retention strategies
- Mentoring and induction programs for new teachers
- Teacher leadership development
- Principal leadership development
- STEM professional development
- Literacy coaching
- Advanced certification support (e.g., National Board Certification)
Key Requirements
- Must be based on a comprehensive needs assessment
- Must align to district/school improvement goals
- PD must be sustained, intensive, and classroom-focused (not one-off workshops)
4. Title III — English Language Acquisition
Purpose
Supplement state and local ELL services to improve English language proficiency and academic achievement of English Learners.
Allocation
- Formula-based: number of English Learners in the district
- Small districts may participate through consortia
Allowable Uses
- Supplemental ELL instruction (beyond what's provided with state/local funds)
- PD for teachers of ELLs (SIOP, co-teaching, language acquisition strategies)
- Parent outreach and engagement (in languages families understand)
- Translation and interpretation services (supplemental)
- Supplemental materials and technology for ELL instruction
Key Rules
- Supplement, not supplant — district must first provide a base ELL program with state/local funds
- Must serve identified English Learners (not general population)
- Must report ELL performance on ACCESS for ELLs annually
- Recently exited ELLs (within 2 years) may be counted for funding but must be monitored
5. Title IV — Student Support and Academic Enrichment
Purpose
Provide students with access to a well-rounded education, improve school conditions for student learning, and improve the use of technology.
Three Pillars
| Pillar | Focus Areas | Minimum Spend (>$30K) |
|---|---|---|
| Well-Rounded Education | STEM, arts, civics, social studies, AP/IB, college/career readiness, music, foreign language | At least 20% |
| Safe & Healthy Students | Mental health services, drug/violence prevention, school-based counseling, bullying prevention, physical education, nutrition | At least 20% |
| Effective Use of Technology | Devices, infrastructure, digital literacy, PD for technology integration, blended learning | Remaining (no minimum for technology for devices if under 15% of allocation) |
Key Rules
- Districts receiving >$30,000 must conduct a needs assessment and address all three pillars
- Districts receiving <$30,000 may focus on one or more pillars
- No more than 15% of allocation may be used to purchase technology infrastructure (devices, equipment)
6. IDEA Part B — Special Education Funding
Purpose
Federal funding to states to support the provision of FAPE for students with disabilities ages 3-21.
Flow of Funds
Federal → DESE → Districts (formula based on child count + poverty data)
Key Requirements
- Maintenance of Effort (MOE): districts must maintain at least the same level of state/local spending on special education from year to year
- Excess Cost: IDEA funds may only be used for costs that exceed what the district spends on the average regular education student
- Supplement, not supplant (with some allowable flexibility for CEIS)
- Coordinated Early Intervening Services (CEIS): up to 15% of IDEA funds may be used for general education students who need additional support but have not been identified for special education (preventive)
Allowable Uses
- Special education teacher salaries (supplemental)
- Related services providers
- Assistive technology
- Professional development for special education staff
- Evaluation and assessment materials
- Transition services
7. Perkins V — Career and Technical Education
Purpose
Federal funding to develop and strengthen CTE programs and improve student achievement in career and technical areas.
Key Elements
- Comprehensive Local Needs Assessment (CLNA): required every 2 years
- Program of Study: sequence of CTE courses leading to a recognized postsecondary credential
- Size, Scope, and Quality: programs must be sufficient to develop student competency
- Work-Based Learning: encouraged (internships, apprenticeships, cooperative education)
- Special Populations: equitable access for students who are members of special populations (disability, ELL, economically disadvantaged, single parents, out-of-workforce, homeless, foster, military)
Allowable Uses
- CTE curriculum development and equipment
- PD for CTE teachers
- Career guidance and counseling
- Supplemental support for special populations in CTE
- Articulation agreements with postsecondary institutions
8. A+ Schools Program Funding
State Funding
- A+ tuition reimbursement is funded through the Missouri Department of Higher Education & Workforce Development (MDHEWD)
- Reimbursement is "last dollar" — applied after all other non-loan aid
- Funding is subject to annual state appropriation
- Historical trend: A+ has been fully funded in most recent years, but appropriation is not guaranteed
School Designation
- Schools apply to DESE for A+ designation
- Must meet criteria including: written agreement with DESE, designated A+ coordinator, established tutoring program, documentation system for student eligibility tracking
9. School Meal Programs
National School Lunch Program (NSLP) / School Breakfast Program (SBP)
- Administered by USDA through DESE School Food Services
- Reimbursement rates for meals served at free, reduced, and paid levels
- Districts must follow USDA meal patterns (whole grains, fruits/vegetables, protein, milk, sodium/fat limits)
Free and Reduced Price Meal (FRPM) Eligibility
| Category | Income Threshold (approximate, updated annually) |
|---|---|
| Free | ≤130% Federal Poverty Level |
| Reduced | 131-185% Federal Poverty Level |
| Paid | >185% Federal Poverty Level |
Community Eligibility Provision (CEP)
- Schools with ≥40% identified students (directly certified for free meals) may provide free meals to ALL students without individual applications
- Simplifies administration and reduces stigma
- Reimbursement calculated based on the Identified Student Percentage (ISP) × 1.6
Other Nutrition Programs
- Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP): supplemental produce for selected elementary schools
- Summer Food Service Program (SFSP): free meals at community sites during summer months
- Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP): meals in before/after school programs, childcare
10. E-Rate and Technology Funding
E-Rate Program
- Federal program (Universal Service Fund) subsidizing internet and telecommunications for schools
- Category 1: Internet access and data transport (eligible for 20-90% discount)
- Category 2: Internal networking (switches, Wi-Fi access points, cabling, UPS)
- Discount rate based on percentage of FRPM-eligible students and urban/rural status
Application Process
- Technology planning (integrated into district strategic plan)
- File FCC Form 470 (request for services — competitive bidding)
- Competitive bidding period (28 days minimum)
- Select service provider
- File FCC Form 471 (application for discount)
- USAC review and funding decision
- Receive services and file for reimbursement/discount
CIPA Compliance
Districts receiving E-Rate must comply with the Children's Internet Protection Act:
- Internet filtering (block visual content that is obscene, child pornography, or harmful to minors)
- Internet safety policy adopted by the board
- At least one public hearing on the policy
- Technology protection measure (filter) in place
11. Transportation Funding
State Transportation Aid
- Missouri reimburses districts for a portion of student transportation costs
- Reimbursement formula considers: route miles, pupil miles, cost per mile, bus fleet, and district size
- Reimbursement typically covers a fraction of actual transportation costs (historically 30-50%)
Eligibility
- Students living more than 3.5 miles from school are generally eligible for state-reimbursed transportation (RSMo 167.231)
- Districts may (and many do) transport students living closer than 3.5 miles, but state reimbursement may be limited
- IEP-mandated transportation is a related service obligation regardless of distance
12. Bond Issues and Capital Funding
General Obligation Bonds
- Used for capital projects: building construction/renovation, technology infrastructure, buses, equipment
- Require 4/7 voter approval (57.14%) at a regular or special election
- Bonded indebtedness limits: generally 15% of assessed valuation (RSMo 164.011)
- Repaid through debt service property tax levy
Lease Purchase Agreements
- Alternative financing for equipment, technology, buses
- Board approval required; does not require voter approval
- Limited by annual payment capacity and board policy
13. Grants and Supplemental Funding Sources
DESE Competitive Grants (Examples — availability varies by year)
- Missouri Preschool Program (MPP) grants
- Trauma-Informed Schools grants
- School Safety grants
- Literacy grants (K-3 reading)
- STEM grants
- After-school program grants (21st CCLC)
Federal Competitive Grants
- 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC) — after-school programs
- Magnet Schools Assistance Program
- Charter Schools Program
- Education Innovation and Research (EIR) grants
- Full-Service Community Schools grants
Other Funding Sources
- Missouri Foundation for Education and local education foundations
- Corporate and community partnerships
- Parent-Teacher Organizations (PTO/PTA) fundraising
- Alumni and donor giving (more common in larger districts)
- Medicaid reimbursement for school-based health services (districts can bill Medicaid for IEP-related health services provided to Medicaid-eligible students)
Nonpartisan informational resource for Missouri — District 2 — not legal, medical, or financial advice. Source: dougdevitre/access-to-education.
Paid for by Matt Grant for Congress.
