Skip to content
Matt Grant for Congress — Missouri — District 2
Access to Education

Community resource

Technology & Digital Learning — Missouri K-12 Education Reference

Technology & Digital Learning — Missouri K-12 Education Reference

flowchart TD A[Technology & Digital Learning] --> B[Infrastructure] A --> C[Devices & Access] A --> D[Safety & Privacy] A --> E[Teaching & Learning] B --> F[Network & Connectivity] B --> G[E-Rate Funding] C --> H[1:1 Device Programs] C --> I[Assistive Technology] D --> J[CIPA Filtering] D --> K[FERPA / COPPA Compliance] D --> L[Cybersecurity] D --> M[SB 68 Phone Ban] E --> N[LMS Platforms] E --> O[Digital Citizenship] E --> P[Virtual & Blended Learning] E --> Q[AI in Education]

Table of Contents

  1. 1:1 Device Programs
  2. Learning Management Systems (LMS)
  3. Digital Citizenship
  4. AI in Education
  5. Virtual & Blended Learning
  6. CIPA Compliance & Internet Filtering
  7. Student Data Privacy
  8. Cybersecurity
  9. Assistive Technology
  10. E-Rate & Technology Funding
  11. Infrastructure & Connectivity
  12. Professional Development for Technology
  13. SB 68 — Electronic Communication Device Ban

1. 1:1 Device Programs

Implementation Models

ModelDescription
Take-home 1:1Every student assigned a device they take home daily
In-school 1:1Every student has a device during school hours; devices stay at school
BYOD (Bring Your Own Device)Students use personal devices; school provides for those without
Shared cartsDevices shared among classrooms on a schedule

Device Options

  • Chromebooks (most common in Missouri — low cost, easy management, Google Workspace integration)
  • iPads (common in elementary, special education, fine arts)
  • Windows laptops (common in CTE, STEM, secondary)
  • Desktop labs (legacy; still used for specialized software, CTE, testing)

Program Considerations

  • Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) — required; signed by student and parent
  • Device insurance/repair programs
  • Internet access at home (equity concern — hotspot lending, community Wi-Fi partnerships)
  • Content filtering on take-home devices (CIPA requires filtering on school-owned devices used off-campus)
  • Digital equity: ensure all students have equal access regardless of income, geography, or disability
  • Refresh cycle: plan for device replacement every 3-5 years
  • Asset management and tracking

2. Learning Management Systems (LMS)

Common LMS Platforms in Missouri Schools

PlatformCommon Usage
Google ClassroomMost widely adopted (K-12); integrated with Google Workspace
CanvasGrowing adoption, especially secondary and districts with post-secondary partnerships
SchoologySome districts; strong assessment tools
SeesawElementary-focused; portfolio and family communication
Microsoft TeamsSome districts using Microsoft 365 ecosystem

LMS Best Practices

  • Consistent use across the district (reduces family confusion)
  • Parent/guardian access (view assignments, grades, communications)
  • Accessibility compliance (WCAG 2.1 standards for students with disabilities)
  • Integration with Student Information System (SIS) for grade passback
  • Regular training for teachers on effective LMS use
  • Content organization standards (consistent naming, structure, due dates)

3. Digital Citizenship

ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) Standards

Missouri has adopted ISTE Standards for Students as a framework:

  1. Empowered Learner
  2. Digital Citizen
  3. Knowledge Constructor
  4. Innovative Designer
  5. Computational Thinker
  6. Creative Communicator
  7. Global Collaborator

Digital Citizenship Curriculum Topics

TopicGrade Level Focus
Online safetyK-5 (stranger danger online, personal information, trusted adults)
Cyberbullying3-12 (recognition, prevention, reporting, bystander intervention)
Digital footprint5-12 (permanent nature of online activity, social media, college/employer searches)
Privacy & security5-12 (passwords, phishing, data collection, privacy settings)
Media literacy6-12 (identifying misinformation, evaluating sources, understanding algorithms)
Intellectual property6-12 (copyright, fair use, citation, plagiarism, Creative Commons)
Healthy tech habitsK-12 (screen time, balance, sleep, physical health, social comparison)
Digital communication3-12 (tone, netiquette, appropriate sharing, context collapse)

Common Digital Citizenship Programs

  • Common Sense Education (most widely used free curriculum)
  • Google Be Internet Awesome (elementary)
  • NetSmartz (National Center for Missing & Exploited Children)
  • CyberPatriot (competition-based cybersecurity education)

4. AI in Education

AI in education is covered in depth in references/ai-in-education/INDEX.md (canonical source). Route there for: DESE AI guidance, AI for teaching, AI for learning/reinforcement, AI for communication, AI policy development, academic integrity, AI data privacy, AI equity, AI literacy K-12, AI tools, AI career readiness, and SB 68 interaction.

Quick context for this file: AI tools used in schools are subject to the same CIPA filtering, FERPA/COPPA data privacy, and technology procurement requirements as all other educational technology. AI-specific concerns (academic integrity, prompt engineering, AI-resistant assessment design) are addressed in the AI reference files.


5. Virtual & Blended Learning

See references/alternative-education.md for MOCAP details.

Blended Learning Models

ModelDescription
Station rotationStudents rotate between online and face-to-face learning stations in the classroom
Flipped classroomStudents access content (video, reading) online at home; class time for practice and application
FlexPrimarily online with teacher available for support; student moves at own pace
A la carteStudent takes some courses online, some face-to-face
Enriched virtualPrimarily online with required in-person sessions

Virtual Learning Best Practices

  • Synchronous + asynchronous balance (live interaction matters)
  • Regular check-ins and progress monitoring
  • Accessible content (captions, alt text, screen reader compatibility)
  • Student engagement strategies (discussion boards, collaborative projects, formative assessment)
  • Technical support for students and families
  • Attendance and participation policies adapted for virtual context

6. CIPA Compliance & Internet Filtering

Children's Internet Protection Act (47 U.S.C. §254)

Required for schools receiving E-Rate funding:

Requirements

  1. Internet filtering — technology protection measure that blocks visual depictions that are:
  • Obscene
  • Child pornography
  • Harmful to minors (for student-accessible devices)
  1. Internet safety policy — board-adopted policy addressing:
  • Access by minors to inappropriate matter
  • Safety and security of minors when using email, chat, and other electronic communications
  • Unauthorized access, including hacking
  • Unauthorized disclosure of personal information regarding minors
  • Measures restricting minors' access to harmful materials
  1. Public hearing — at least one public hearing before adopting the internet safety policy
  2. Education — educating minors about appropriate online behavior, cyberbullying awareness, and interaction on social networking sites

Filtering Implementation

  • Enterprise-level content filtering (e.g., GoGuardian, Lightspeed, Securly, Cisco Umbrella)
  • Filtering must apply to school network AND school-owned devices used off-campus
  • Authorized adults (teachers, administrators) may request unblocking of specific sites for educational purposes
  • Over-filtering (blocking legitimate educational content) is a common concern; regular filter review recommended

7. Student Data Privacy

FERPA (20 U.S.C. §1232g)

See references/students.md for FERPA overview. Technology-specific applications:

Key Technology Privacy Requirements

RequirementDescription
Vendor agreementsDistricts must have agreements with all technology vendors who access student PII; agreements must specify data use, retention, deletion, and security
RSMo 161.096Missouri student data privacy law — prohibits use of student data for commercial purposes; requires transparency about data collection
COPPA (Children's Online Privacy Protection Act)Applies to online services collecting data from children under 13; schools can consent on behalf of parents for educational purposes
Directory informationAnnual notification; parent opt-out right; applies to online directories and school apps
Data breach notificationDistrict must have a plan for responding to data breaches; Missouri has a general breach notification law (RSMo 407.1500)

Technology Vendor Vetting

Before adopting any educational technology tool:

  1. Review privacy policy and terms of service
  2. Determine what student data is collected, how it's used, stored, and shared
  3. Ensure FERPA compliance and get appropriate agreements signed
  4. Check for COPPA compliance (for tools used by students under 13)
  5. Verify data encryption (in transit and at rest)
  6. Confirm data deletion procedures when contract ends
  7. Review for accessibility compliance (Section 508 / WCAG 2.1)

Student Data Governance

Districts should establish a data governance framework:

  • Data governance committee (IT, administration, legal, teaching)
  • Data classification system (public, internal, confidential, restricted)
  • Role-based access controls (who can see what data)
  • Data retention and destruction schedules
  • Staff training on data privacy and security
  • Incident response plan for data breaches

8. Cybersecurity

Threats to School Districts

  • Ransomware attacks (increasingly targeting school districts)
  • Phishing (email and social engineering attacks on staff)
  • Data breaches (student and employee records)
  • Unauthorized access (hacking of school systems)
  • DDoS attacks (disrupting online learning and operations)

Cybersecurity Best Practices

  • Multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all staff accounts
  • Regular security awareness training for staff
  • Endpoint protection (antivirus, device management)
  • Network segmentation (separate student, staff, IoT, and guest networks)
  • Regular patching and software updates
  • Data backup strategy (3-2-1 rule: 3 copies, 2 media, 1 offsite)
  • Incident response plan
  • Cyber insurance
  • Vulnerability assessments and penetration testing
  • FCC Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot Program (when available)

9. Assistive Technology

See references/specialists.md for AT overview. Technology-specific details:

Software-Based AT Common in Missouri Schools

Tool CategoryExamples
Text-to-speechRead&Write, NaturalReader, Immersive Reader (Microsoft), screen readers (JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver)
Speech-to-textDragon NaturallySpeaking, Google Voice Typing, Apple Dictation
Word predictionCo:Writer, Google predictive text
Graphic organizersInspiration, MindMeister, Google Drawings
AAC (Augmentative & Alternative Communication)Proloquo2Go, TouchChat, LAMP Words for Life
Accessibility featuresBuilt-in OS accessibility (zoom, color contrast, captions, switch access)

Accessibility Standards

  • WCAG 2.1 (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) — applies to all digital content used in instruction
  • Section 508 (federal) — federal technology must be accessible; often used as benchmark for school technology procurement
  • VPAT (Voluntary Product Accessibility Template) — request from vendors before purchasing educational technology

10. E-Rate & Technology Funding

See references/funding-programs.md for detailed E-Rate information.

Additional Technology Funding Sources

SourceUse
Title IV-AEffective use of technology (devices, infrastructure, PD, digital literacy) — no more than 15% on devices
IDEA Part BAssistive technology devices and services for students with IEPs
Perkins VCTE technology and equipment
State technology grantsWhen available through DESE
Bond issuesCapital funding for technology infrastructure
Lease-purchaseFinancing for device purchases
Federal Emergency Connectivity FundWhen funded — off-campus internet access and devices for students

11. Infrastructure & Connectivity

Bandwidth Recommendations

  • FCC goal: 1 Mbps per student (external internet)
  • 10 Gbps internal network backbone per school (for modern learning environments)
  • Sufficient Wi-Fi density for 1:1 + IoT devices

Network Architecture

  • Wired backbone (fiber to each building, Cat6a+ to access points)
  • Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) or newer access points
  • Network management and monitoring tools
  • Content delivery optimization (caching, CDN)
  • Guest network isolation
  • IoT network segmentation (HVAC, security cameras, etc.)

Rural Broadband Challenges

See references/rural-education.md for detailed rural connectivity information.


12. Professional Development for Technology

ISTE Standards for Educators

  1. Learner — continually improving through technology-enabled professional learning
  2. Leader — seeking leadership opportunities for technology integration
  3. Citizen — modeling responsible digital citizenship
  4. Collaborator — using technology to collaborate with colleagues and students
  5. Designer — designing authentic, learner-driven activities enhanced by technology
  6. Facilitator — facilitating student learning with technology
  7. Analyst — using data and technology to improve instruction

PD Models for Technology

  • Coaching and mentoring (technology integration coaches)
  • Just-in-time training (micro-learning, video tutorials, help desk)
  • Professional learning communities (PLCs) focused on technology
  • Conference attendance (METC — Missouri Educational Technology Conference, ISTE Conference)
  • Graduate coursework in educational technology
  • Vendor-provided training (during tool adoption)
  • Student-led training (student tech teams teaching staff)

13. SB 68 — Electronic Communication Device Ban

Missouri Senate Bill 68 (Signed July 9, 2025)

Governor Kehoe signed SB 68 enacting a statewide ban on electronic communication devices in Missouri public and charter schools beginning with the 2025-26 academic year.

Key Provisions

  • Personal electronic communication devices (phones, smartwatches with communication capability) restricted during the school day
  • Districts must adopt policies implementing the ban
  • Specific implementation details (collection, storage, exceptions, enforcement) are determined by local board policy

Implementation Considerations

AreaGuidance
Collection methodOptions: phone pouches (Yondr), phone lockers, turned in to teacher, kept in locker (powered off) — district policy determines method
ExceptionsMedical devices, IEP/504 accommodations requiring device access, parental emergency communication procedures, teacher-directed instructional use (district policy defines)
EnforcementProgressive consequences per board policy; should not result in disproportionate discipline
Parent communicationEstablish clear alternative for parents to reach students during emergencies (call front office)
Instructional devicesSchool-issued devices (Chromebooks, iPads) are NOT electronic communication devices — these continue as normal
Before/after schoolPolicy may or may not cover before/after school hours — board policy determines
ExtracurricularsPolicy may or may not cover activities outside the school day — board policy determines

Interaction with Other Policies

  • AI policy: SB 68 simplifies AI governance by channeling student technology access through managed school devices
  • 1:1 programs: school-issued devices become the sole student access point during school hours
  • BYOD programs: effectively suspended during school day (may still apply before/after school)
  • Digital citizenship: reinforces boundaries; curriculum should address healthy device habits
  • Special education: IEP teams must consider whether device access is a necessary accommodation; if yes, must be documented in IEP

→ For AI-specific implications of SB 68: see references/ai-in-education/ai-policy-governance.md §9

Nonpartisan informational resource for Missouri — District 2 — not legal, medical, or financial advice. Source: dougdevitre/access-to-education.

Paid for by Matt Grant for Congress.