Community resource
Technology & Digital Learning — Missouri K-12 Education Reference
Technology & Digital Learning — Missouri K-12 Education Reference
Table of Contents
- 1:1 Device Programs
- Learning Management Systems (LMS)
- Digital Citizenship
- AI in Education
- Virtual & Blended Learning
- CIPA Compliance & Internet Filtering
- Student Data Privacy
- Cybersecurity
- Assistive Technology
- E-Rate & Technology Funding
- Infrastructure & Connectivity
- Professional Development for Technology
- SB 68 — Electronic Communication Device Ban
1. 1:1 Device Programs
Implementation Models
| Model | Description |
|---|---|
| Take-home 1:1 | Every student assigned a device they take home daily |
| In-school 1:1 | Every student has a device during school hours; devices stay at school |
| BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) | Students use personal devices; school provides for those without |
| Shared carts | Devices shared among classrooms on a schedule |
Device Options
- Chromebooks (most common in Missouri — low cost, easy management, Google Workspace integration)
- iPads (common in elementary, special education, fine arts)
- Windows laptops (common in CTE, STEM, secondary)
- Desktop labs (legacy; still used for specialized software, CTE, testing)
Program Considerations
- Acceptable Use Policy (AUP) — required; signed by student and parent
- Device insurance/repair programs
- Internet access at home (equity concern — hotspot lending, community Wi-Fi partnerships)
- Content filtering on take-home devices (CIPA requires filtering on school-owned devices used off-campus)
- Digital equity: ensure all students have equal access regardless of income, geography, or disability
- Refresh cycle: plan for device replacement every 3-5 years
- Asset management and tracking
2. Learning Management Systems (LMS)
Common LMS Platforms in Missouri Schools
| Platform | Common Usage |
|---|---|
| Google Classroom | Most widely adopted (K-12); integrated with Google Workspace |
| Canvas | Growing adoption, especially secondary and districts with post-secondary partnerships |
| Schoology | Some districts; strong assessment tools |
| Seesaw | Elementary-focused; portfolio and family communication |
| Microsoft Teams | Some districts using Microsoft 365 ecosystem |
LMS Best Practices
- Consistent use across the district (reduces family confusion)
- Parent/guardian access (view assignments, grades, communications)
- Accessibility compliance (WCAG 2.1 standards for students with disabilities)
- Integration with Student Information System (SIS) for grade passback
- Regular training for teachers on effective LMS use
- Content organization standards (consistent naming, structure, due dates)
3. Digital Citizenship
ISTE (International Society for Technology in Education) Standards
Missouri has adopted ISTE Standards for Students as a framework:
- Empowered Learner
- Digital Citizen
- Knowledge Constructor
- Innovative Designer
- Computational Thinker
- Creative Communicator
- Global Collaborator
Digital Citizenship Curriculum Topics
| Topic | Grade Level Focus |
|---|---|
| Online safety | K-5 (stranger danger online, personal information, trusted adults) |
| Cyberbullying | 3-12 (recognition, prevention, reporting, bystander intervention) |
| Digital footprint | 5-12 (permanent nature of online activity, social media, college/employer searches) |
| Privacy & security | 5-12 (passwords, phishing, data collection, privacy settings) |
| Media literacy | 6-12 (identifying misinformation, evaluating sources, understanding algorithms) |
| Intellectual property | 6-12 (copyright, fair use, citation, plagiarism, Creative Commons) |
| Healthy tech habits | K-12 (screen time, balance, sleep, physical health, social comparison) |
| Digital communication | 3-12 (tone, netiquette, appropriate sharing, context collapse) |
Common Digital Citizenship Programs
- Common Sense Education (most widely used free curriculum)
- Google Be Internet Awesome (elementary)
- NetSmartz (National Center for Missing & Exploited Children)
- CyberPatriot (competition-based cybersecurity education)
4. AI in Education
→ AI in education is covered in depth in references/ai-in-education/INDEX.md (canonical source). Route there for: DESE AI guidance, AI for teaching, AI for learning/reinforcement, AI for communication, AI policy development, academic integrity, AI data privacy, AI equity, AI literacy K-12, AI tools, AI career readiness, and SB 68 interaction.
Quick context for this file: AI tools used in schools are subject to the same CIPA filtering, FERPA/COPPA data privacy, and technology procurement requirements as all other educational technology. AI-specific concerns (academic integrity, prompt engineering, AI-resistant assessment design) are addressed in the AI reference files.
5. Virtual & Blended Learning
See references/alternative-education.md for MOCAP details.
Blended Learning Models
| Model | Description |
|---|---|
| Station rotation | Students rotate between online and face-to-face learning stations in the classroom |
| Flipped classroom | Students access content (video, reading) online at home; class time for practice and application |
| Flex | Primarily online with teacher available for support; student moves at own pace |
| A la carte | Student takes some courses online, some face-to-face |
| Enriched virtual | Primarily online with required in-person sessions |
Virtual Learning Best Practices
- Synchronous + asynchronous balance (live interaction matters)
- Regular check-ins and progress monitoring
- Accessible content (captions, alt text, screen reader compatibility)
- Student engagement strategies (discussion boards, collaborative projects, formative assessment)
- Technical support for students and families
- Attendance and participation policies adapted for virtual context
6. CIPA Compliance & Internet Filtering
Children's Internet Protection Act (47 U.S.C. §254)
Required for schools receiving E-Rate funding:
Requirements
- Internet filtering — technology protection measure that blocks visual depictions that are:
- Obscene
- Child pornography
- Harmful to minors (for student-accessible devices)
- Internet safety policy — board-adopted policy addressing:
- Access by minors to inappropriate matter
- Safety and security of minors when using email, chat, and other electronic communications
- Unauthorized access, including hacking
- Unauthorized disclosure of personal information regarding minors
- Measures restricting minors' access to harmful materials
- Public hearing — at least one public hearing before adopting the internet safety policy
- Education — educating minors about appropriate online behavior, cyberbullying awareness, and interaction on social networking sites
Filtering Implementation
- Enterprise-level content filtering (e.g., GoGuardian, Lightspeed, Securly, Cisco Umbrella)
- Filtering must apply to school network AND school-owned devices used off-campus
- Authorized adults (teachers, administrators) may request unblocking of specific sites for educational purposes
- Over-filtering (blocking legitimate educational content) is a common concern; regular filter review recommended
7. Student Data Privacy
FERPA (20 U.S.C. §1232g)
See references/students.md for FERPA overview. Technology-specific applications:
Key Technology Privacy Requirements
| Requirement | Description |
|---|---|
| Vendor agreements | Districts must have agreements with all technology vendors who access student PII; agreements must specify data use, retention, deletion, and security |
| RSMo 161.096 | Missouri student data privacy law — prohibits use of student data for commercial purposes; requires transparency about data collection |
| COPPA (Children's Online Privacy Protection Act) | Applies to online services collecting data from children under 13; schools can consent on behalf of parents for educational purposes |
| Directory information | Annual notification; parent opt-out right; applies to online directories and school apps |
| Data breach notification | District must have a plan for responding to data breaches; Missouri has a general breach notification law (RSMo 407.1500) |
Technology Vendor Vetting
Before adopting any educational technology tool:
- Review privacy policy and terms of service
- Determine what student data is collected, how it's used, stored, and shared
- Ensure FERPA compliance and get appropriate agreements signed
- Check for COPPA compliance (for tools used by students under 13)
- Verify data encryption (in transit and at rest)
- Confirm data deletion procedures when contract ends
- Review for accessibility compliance (Section 508 / WCAG 2.1)
Student Data Governance
Districts should establish a data governance framework:
- Data governance committee (IT, administration, legal, teaching)
- Data classification system (public, internal, confidential, restricted)
- Role-based access controls (who can see what data)
- Data retention and destruction schedules
- Staff training on data privacy and security
- Incident response plan for data breaches
8. Cybersecurity
Threats to School Districts
- Ransomware attacks (increasingly targeting school districts)
- Phishing (email and social engineering attacks on staff)
- Data breaches (student and employee records)
- Unauthorized access (hacking of school systems)
- DDoS attacks (disrupting online learning and operations)
Cybersecurity Best Practices
- Multi-factor authentication (MFA) for all staff accounts
- Regular security awareness training for staff
- Endpoint protection (antivirus, device management)
- Network segmentation (separate student, staff, IoT, and guest networks)
- Regular patching and software updates
- Data backup strategy (3-2-1 rule: 3 copies, 2 media, 1 offsite)
- Incident response plan
- Cyber insurance
- Vulnerability assessments and penetration testing
- FCC Schools and Libraries Cybersecurity Pilot Program (when available)
9. Assistive Technology
See references/specialists.md for AT overview. Technology-specific details:
Software-Based AT Common in Missouri Schools
| Tool Category | Examples |
|---|---|
| Text-to-speech | Read&Write, NaturalReader, Immersive Reader (Microsoft), screen readers (JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver) |
| Speech-to-text | Dragon NaturallySpeaking, Google Voice Typing, Apple Dictation |
| Word prediction | Co:Writer, Google predictive text |
| Graphic organizers | Inspiration, MindMeister, Google Drawings |
| AAC (Augmentative & Alternative Communication) | Proloquo2Go, TouchChat, LAMP Words for Life |
| Accessibility features | Built-in OS accessibility (zoom, color contrast, captions, switch access) |
Accessibility Standards
- WCAG 2.1 (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) — applies to all digital content used in instruction
- Section 508 (federal) — federal technology must be accessible; often used as benchmark for school technology procurement
- VPAT (Voluntary Product Accessibility Template) — request from vendors before purchasing educational technology
10. E-Rate & Technology Funding
See references/funding-programs.md for detailed E-Rate information.
Additional Technology Funding Sources
| Source | Use |
|---|---|
| Title IV-A | Effective use of technology (devices, infrastructure, PD, digital literacy) — no more than 15% on devices |
| IDEA Part B | Assistive technology devices and services for students with IEPs |
| Perkins V | CTE technology and equipment |
| State technology grants | When available through DESE |
| Bond issues | Capital funding for technology infrastructure |
| Lease-purchase | Financing for device purchases |
| Federal Emergency Connectivity Fund | When funded — off-campus internet access and devices for students |
11. Infrastructure & Connectivity
Bandwidth Recommendations
- FCC goal: 1 Mbps per student (external internet)
- 10 Gbps internal network backbone per school (for modern learning environments)
- Sufficient Wi-Fi density for 1:1 + IoT devices
Network Architecture
- Wired backbone (fiber to each building, Cat6a+ to access points)
- Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) or newer access points
- Network management and monitoring tools
- Content delivery optimization (caching, CDN)
- Guest network isolation
- IoT network segmentation (HVAC, security cameras, etc.)
Rural Broadband Challenges
See references/rural-education.md for detailed rural connectivity information.
12. Professional Development for Technology
ISTE Standards for Educators
- Learner — continually improving through technology-enabled professional learning
- Leader — seeking leadership opportunities for technology integration
- Citizen — modeling responsible digital citizenship
- Collaborator — using technology to collaborate with colleagues and students
- Designer — designing authentic, learner-driven activities enhanced by technology
- Facilitator — facilitating student learning with technology
- Analyst — using data and technology to improve instruction
PD Models for Technology
- Coaching and mentoring (technology integration coaches)
- Just-in-time training (micro-learning, video tutorials, help desk)
- Professional learning communities (PLCs) focused on technology
- Conference attendance (METC — Missouri Educational Technology Conference, ISTE Conference)
- Graduate coursework in educational technology
- Vendor-provided training (during tool adoption)
- Student-led training (student tech teams teaching staff)
13. SB 68 — Electronic Communication Device Ban
Missouri Senate Bill 68 (Signed July 9, 2025)
Governor Kehoe signed SB 68 enacting a statewide ban on electronic communication devices in Missouri public and charter schools beginning with the 2025-26 academic year.
Key Provisions
- Personal electronic communication devices (phones, smartwatches with communication capability) restricted during the school day
- Districts must adopt policies implementing the ban
- Specific implementation details (collection, storage, exceptions, enforcement) are determined by local board policy
Implementation Considerations
| Area | Guidance |
|---|---|
| Collection method | Options: phone pouches (Yondr), phone lockers, turned in to teacher, kept in locker (powered off) — district policy determines method |
| Exceptions | Medical devices, IEP/504 accommodations requiring device access, parental emergency communication procedures, teacher-directed instructional use (district policy defines) |
| Enforcement | Progressive consequences per board policy; should not result in disproportionate discipline |
| Parent communication | Establish clear alternative for parents to reach students during emergencies (call front office) |
| Instructional devices | School-issued devices (Chromebooks, iPads) are NOT electronic communication devices — these continue as normal |
| Before/after school | Policy may or may not cover before/after school hours — board policy determines |
| Extracurriculars | Policy may or may not cover activities outside the school day — board policy determines |
Interaction with Other Policies
- AI policy: SB 68 simplifies AI governance by channeling student technology access through managed school devices
- 1:1 programs: school-issued devices become the sole student access point during school hours
- BYOD programs: effectively suspended during school day (may still apply before/after school)
- Digital citizenship: reinforces boundaries; curriculum should address healthy device habits
- Special education: IEP teams must consider whether device access is a necessary accommodation; if yes, must be documented in IEP
→ For AI-specific implications of SB 68: see references/ai-in-education/ai-policy-governance.md §9
Nonpartisan informational resource for Missouri — District 2 — not legal, medical, or financial advice. Source: dougdevitre/access-to-education.
Paid for by Matt Grant for Congress.
